Dec 28, 2023

about 6 min read

Monolithic vs Microservices: Which is the Right Architecture?

Monolithic vs Microservices: The epic battle for software supremacy. Discover their own strengths and weaknesses to choose your champion.


In the fast-paced world of application development, selecting the right architecture can be the difference between success and failure of an app. The two most prominent approaches—monolithic vs microservices—are often pitted against each other. 


However, determining which one is superior requires a close examination of their respective strengths and weaknesses. Doing so lets you pick the perfect architectural fit for your project.


Read more: Microservices vs API: Differences and Collaboration


What is Monolithic Architecture?



Imagine a castle, all-encompassing and grand. A monolithic architecture embodies this image. It’s a single, tightly coupled codebase where all functionalities are interwoven. It’s like baking a cake. All ingredients go into one bowl, resulting in a delicious, unified whole. 


Monoliths are simple to understand, deploy, and debug, making them ideal for smaller projects or those with well-defined functionalities. According to a report in 2023 by Red Hat, 75% of enterprises still rely on monolithic applications.


There are two main types of monolithic architecture: single-process and modular. 


  • The single-process architecture involves deploying all the code of an app in one go. This approach offers high performance and low overhead but also has drawbacks. Specifically, it has high coupling and low scalability. 
  • In contrast, the modular monolithic architecture is built around a single application process that consists of multiple modules. Each module can work independently, making it a highly scalable and modular architecture. However, it’s worth noting that it has low performance and high coupling.

Read more: Tech Giants Embrace Microservices Architecture


What is Microservices Architecture?



Microworlds within a macrocosm—that’s the essence of microservices. Each functionality becomes an independent, miniaturized service, communicating with its neighbors through APIs. Think of it like building a city. Each shop, cafe, and house is a service, collaborating to create a vibrant whole. 


This decentralized approach offers unparalleled agility, scalability, and fault tolerance. However, it’s more complex to orchestrate, requiring sophisticated communication and monitoring systems.

As per O’Reilly’s 2020 survey, nearly 61% of respondents’ organizations had been utilizing microservices for at least one year, while 28% had been doing so for three years or more.


There are three primary types of microservices architecture: client-server, peer-to-peer, and hybrid. 


  • In the client-server architecture, the client application requests a service from the server application. This model is easy to implement but has high coupling and low scalability. 
  • In contrast, the peer-to-peer architecture involves two or more services that act as peers and exchange data directly without a central server. While this model is more scalable and resilient, it has high complexity and security challenges. 
  • The hybrid architecture combines the client-server and peer-to-peer models to achieve the best balance between performance, reliability, and maintainability. However, it requires careful design and coordination to ensure the system is flexible and adaptable.


Monolithic vs. Microservices Architecture: A Detailed Comparison



When comparing monolithic vs microservices, we will see that they have different characteristics and trade-offs affecting various application development aspects. Here are some of the main differences between them:




Monolithic applications are typically easier to develop and test than microservices due to their more straightforward and consistent environment. However, as they grow larger and more complex, monolithic applications become increasingly challenging to maintain and modify. 


On the other hand, microservices architecture offers more flexibility and modularity than monolithic applications. You can work on different services independently, using various technologies and frameworks. Nonetheless, it poses its own set of challenges, particularly in terms of coordination and integration. As a result, it requires more communication and collaboration among team members to ensure effective functioning.




Monolithic applications have the advantage of being easy to deploy and monitor. Since they have a single deployment unit and a single point of failure, they are relatively straightforward to manage. However, they also come with a higher risk of downtime and other issues, requiring more time and effort to troubleshoot and update. 


In contrast, microservices applications offer greater agility and resilience. With faster and more frequent deployments and updates for each service, they can quickly adapt to changes. However, they also come with more challenges for configuration and management. They require more tools and processes to orchestrate and monitor the system, which can be more complex.




Scaling monolithic applications can pose a challenge due to the interconnectedness of components within the system. This means that developers must scale the whole application as a single unit, which can be expensive and ineffective. 


Conversely, scaling microservices applications can be more straightforward because of the independent nature of the services within the system. Developers can scale individual services as needed, enabling greater flexibility and efficiency. Nevertheless, scaling microservices also brings its own set of obstacles, such as load balancing, ensuring data consistency, and service orchestration, among others.




Debugging monolithic applications can be daunting because of the limited insight into how various components interact within the system. Identifying errors or performance issues can be challenging without affecting other parts of the system.


On the other hand, debugging microservice applications can be less complicated due to the increased visibility of how different services interact with each other through APIs. You can utilize tools such as logging, tracing, and monitoring to pinpoint errors or performance issues in specific services. 


Nonetheless, debugging microservices can be challenging because of the system’s distributed nature and increased complexity. You must tackle issues like network latency, service discovery, and fault tolerance.




Securing monolithic applications can seem more straightforward than securing microservices, as you only need to use a single security layer to safeguard the entire application from external threats. However, this approach can also be quite risky, given the single point of failure within the system. If one component is compromised, the entire application can become vulnerable, exposing sensitive data to unauthorized access.


On the other hand, securing microservices applications can be more complex, as you must use multiple security layers to protect each service from both internal and external threats. Despite the added complexity, this approach can also be more robust, thanks to the system’s distributed nature. If one service is compromised, the impact can be isolated and contained, reducing the overall risk of data breaches and other security incidents.


Monolithic vs Microservices: Which is the Right Architecture for You?



When comparing monolithic vs microservices, we can see neither is better or worse. Both have their pros and cons depending on the context and requirements of the project. Nevertheless, there are some general guidelines that can help you decide which architecture is more suitable for you:


  • Project size and complexity. For smaller, simpler projects, a monolithic approach might suffice. In contrast, large, complex projects often benefit from the scalability and agility of microservices.
  • Development team size and expertise. Monolithic architectures require fewer specialists, while microservices demand a team comfortable with distributed systems and API design.
  • Business needs and priorities. If rapid innovation and resilience are crucial, microservices might be the way to go. On the other hand, a monolithic approach might be more efficient for more straightforward applications with less frequent updates.




These architectures are not inherently good or bad. They are just tools with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, choosing between the two—monolithic vs microservices— requires careful consideration of your project’s needs and your team’s capabilities. 


Remember, the best architecture is the one that empowers your development process and fosters agility, ultimately delivering a successful software product. So, whether you go for the towering monolith or the bustling metropolis of microservices, ensure your architecture serves as a solid foundation for your software to thrive. 


Nonetheless, you can contact Golden Owl if you want more specific advice. We are a premier IT outsourcing company with branches in six countries: the UK, Singapore, Vietnam, Australia, the US, and Norway. As a one-stop devshop, our company offers clients a wide range of IT services and solutions worldwide, microservices.


Our latest posts

See more

January 20, 2021

about 7 min read

WooComerce vs Shopify: Which is Best for eCommerce?

January 27, 2021

about 4 min read

Android VS iOS: Which Platform To Build Your Mobile App On First In 2021

June 09, 2021

about 5 min read

90% startups fail and ways to be in the 10%

Other Services